CASE DIGEST Ecarma vs CA G.R. No. 193374 | June 08, 2016 Topic: Partition and distribution of estate under Art. 1078 and 1081 of NCC; Facts: Spouses Natalio and Arminda owned 4 properties designated as Kitanlad, Cuyapo and Lala consisting of 2 lots. They have 7 children among them were Gerry Ecarma and private respondent Renato Ecarma. Natalio predeceased Arminda, and therefater their children executed Extrajudicial Settlement of the Estate. No physical division of properties was effected and they remained in co-ownership even after the death of Arminda. Renato Ecarma as the Special Administrator in the intestate proceedings filed a Project of Partition because of the conflict between Gerry and the other heirs over actual division of their inherited properties. The legal heirs except Gerry expressed their desire to have the property partitioned. Gerry objected because the proposed partition is not feasible, impractical and detrimental. The planned partition ...
Case Digests and Doctrines Simplified