Skip to main content

LIST OF CASE HERE


Notes and Summary:




The lists here are alphabetically ARRANGE
for better Searching (just click it):


A

C

E

K

L

M

N


P

Q

S

V

W

Y

Z

Popular posts from this blog

Ocampo vs Enriquez, GR No. 225973| 11/8/2016

Full Text:  https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/62526 Doctrines: It is well-settled that no question involving the constitutionality or validity of a law or governmental act may be heard and decided by the Court unless the following requisites for judicial inquiry are present: (a) there must be an actual case or controversy calling for the exercise of judicial power; (b) the person challenging the act must have the standing to question the validity of the subject act or issuance; (c) the question of constitutionality must be raised at the earliest opportunity; and (d) the issue of constitutionality must be the very lis mota of the case. In this case, the absence of the first two requisites, which are the most essential, renders the discussion of the last two superfluous. An “actual case or controversy” is one which involves a conflict of legal rights, an assertion of opposite legal claims, susceptible of judicial resolution as distinguished from a hypothetical...

People vs. Jugueta, 788 SCRA 331, G.R. No. 202124 April 5, 2016

G.R. No. 202124. April 5, 2016. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee, vs. IRENEO JUGUETA, accused-appellant. PONENTE:  PERALTA, J.:  Synopsis: In Criminal Case No. 7702-G, Irenneo Jugueta was charged with Multiple Attempted Murder along with Gilbert Estores and Roger San Miguel. However, Roger San Miguel moved for reinvestigation of the case and was eventually dismissed, leaving Irenneo as the only defendant. The prosecution's witness, Norberto, testified that Irenneo and the two other men entered his family's nipa hut and fired shots, causing the death of one daughter and injury to another. Irenneo offered a defense of denial and alibi, but this was found to be weak by the trial court, which ruled that Irenneo conspired with the two other men to shoot the family of Norberto. The trial court's judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. The main issue raised in the appeal was the inconsistencies in Norberto's testimony, but these were deemed to be trivial an...

Legal Consequences of Spreading Fake News in the Philippines

In today’s digital landscape, fake news has become a serious threat to public order and national security . The Philippine legal framework provides mechanisms to prosecute individuals spreading false information , particularly when it causes harm or undue distress to others. Legal Framework Against Fake News 📌 Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (RA 10175) ✔ Covers online libel and fraud under Section 4. ✔ Moreover, any crimes committed in violation of RPC (Revised Penal Code) and/or SPL (Special Penal Laws) via information and communications technology (ICT) , penalties are increased under Section 6 . 📌 Revised Penal Code – Article 154 (Unlawful Use of Publication and Utterances) in relation to Sec. 6 of RA 10175  ✔ Penalizes the publication or spreading of false information that: Endangers public order Harms state interests Encourages disobedience to the law ✔ Punishable by arresto mayor (one month to six months imprisonment) and a fine ranging from P40,000 to P200,0...