Definition and Legal Requisites of a Contract
📌 Definition ✔ A contract is a meeting of minds between two persons where one binds himself to give something or render a service (Article 1305, New Civil Code).
📌 Essential Requisites (Article 1318, New Civil Code) ✔ Consent – Agreement between contracting parties. ✔ Object Certain – Clear subject matter of the contract. ✔ Cause – The obligation that creates rights between the parties.
Stages in Contract Formation
Contracts pass through three distinct phases:
📌 Preparation (Negotiation Phase) ✔ Parties express interest and negotiate terms, culminating in an agreement.
📌 Perfection (Birth of the Contract) ✔ When parties agree upon all essential elements, making the contract binding.
📌 Consummation (Fulfillment Phase) ✔ When parties perform their obligations, leading to contract completion or termination.
📌 Relevant Case: Robern Development Corporation v. People’s Landless Association (693 SCRA 24, 2013)
Interpreting Contracts: Key Doctrines
✔ Ambiguities Are Construed Against the Drafter
If contract terms are unclear, courts interpret them strictly against the party that caused the ambiguity.
Prevents powerful entities from exploiting weaker parties with complex agreements.
Relevant Case: Fieldmen’s Insurance Co., Inc. v. Vda. de Songco (25 SCRA 70, 1968)
✔ Extrinsic Evidence May Be Considered for Clarity
If contract terms are too vague, courts examine outside factors like circumstances, relationships, and intent.
Relevant Case: Heirs of Amparo del Rosario v. Santos (108 SCRA 43, 1981)
✔ Preference for Less Onerous Interpretations
When ambiguity exists, courts favor interpretations that impose fewer burdens on the parties.
Relevant Case: Castelo v. Court of Appeals (244 SCRA 180, 1995)
✔ Special Provisions Override General Clauses
Specific provisions within a contract take precedence over general clauses.
Relevant Case: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas v. Santamaria (395 SCRA 84, 2003)
✔ Plain Meaning Rule (Literal Interpretation)
If contractual language is clear, courts do not interpret beyond its literal meaning.
Prevents courts from altering contracts or adding unintended stipulations.
Relevant Case: United Planters Sugar Milling Co., Inc. v. Court of Appeals (583 SCRA 63, 2009)
✔ Contracts Concealing Usury or Fraud Can Be Recharacterized
Courts may consider parol evidence to prove a written contract is actually a disguised loan or fraudulent scheme.
Relevant Case: Investors Finance Corporation v. Autoworld Sales Corporation (340 SCRA 735, 2000)
Legal Takeaways for Contract Disputes
✅ Unclear contracts are interpreted against the drafter – Prevents stronger parties from exploiting weaker ones.
✅ Courts may examine external evidence – When contracts lack clarity, outside circumstances help determine intent.
✅ Fairer interpretations are preferred – Courts favor balanced agreements that impose fewer burdens.
✅ Contracts disguising usury or fraud can be challenged – Parol evidence proves hidden unlawful agreements.
✅ Judges cannot modify or add contract terms – Courts enforce only what was agreed upon, not what they think is fairer.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s rulings ensure contracts are interpreted fairly, preventing manipulative agreements and legal traps. Understanding contract interpretation principles helps protect parties from exploitative terms and ambiguous clauses, ensuring equitable enforcement of agreements.
📌 Relevant Case References:
739 SCRA 735
Fieldmen’s Insurance Co., Inc. v. Vda. de Songco (25 SCRA 70, 1968)
Heirs of Amparo del Rosario v. Santos (108 SCRA 43, 1981)
Castelo v. Court of Appeals (244 SCRA 180, 1995)
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas v. Santamaria (395 SCRA 84, 2003)
United Planters Sugar Milling Co., Inc. v. Court of Appeals (583 SCRA 63, 2009)
Investors Finance Corporation v. Autoworld Sales Corporation (340 SCRA 735, 2000)